Follow on Twitter: @9Dspin


World of 9 dimensions

What is 9 dimensional spin? And what is the Cabibbo Angle?

In 2011, Neppe and Close proposed a broad model for reality - the Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm (TDVP). TDVP proposes that the finite is made up of distinct parts. These are contained within a continuous infinite reality. TDVP postulates that the finite consists of 9 dimensions, and vortical / spin movements occur across these dimensions.

The Cabibbo mixing angle is an empirically derived angle in Theoretical Physics, and it cannot be derived from the standard particle physics model by just applying 3 dimensions of space and one moment in time (3S-1t)

In our initial published paper, we test two related hypotheses on the mathematical derivation of the Cabibbo mixing angle:

  1. It can be derived only from a nine-dimensional mathematical model.
  2. It supports the TDVP hypothesis that the finite reality consists of a 9 dimensional vortical (spinning) model.

We demonstrate that there is a solid mathematical basis for demonstrating a 9-dimensional finite spin model. 2 lines of evidence exist:

  1. A brief non-specific one where one can extrapolate upwards and downwards applying rotation from 9 dimensions to /and from 1 dimension and demonstrate the same asymmetric findings.
  2. 2. A detailed mathematical derivation explaining why the mixing angle of fermions, exemplified by the Cabibbo angle in quarks, is approximately 13.04 degrees: It requires a 9-dimensional spin model to demonstrate it. This very specific and profoundly important finding resolves a puzzle that has mystified scientists for 50 years.

We derive the mixing angle by applying a 9-dimensional rotational model, extrapolating through dimensions. We utilize the Bohr radius (radius of the Hydrogen atom), radians and the Lorentz correction as the electron velocity is close to the velocity of light. We demonstrate the angle is 13.032 degrees. This cannot be derived by using a conventional Standard Model of Physics with 3 dimensions of space and one point in time. Nor can the Cabibbo angle figure be calculated applying anything but a 9 dimensional model suggesting that models with <9 or >9 finite dimensions are incorrect. Moreover, the requirement of spin rotation suggests that models involving folding dimensions are also falsified.

Prior to developing this demonstration explaining the Cabibbo mixing angle, we have developed the Triadic Dimensional Distinction Vortical Paradigm 1; 2 (TDVP) In TDVP, we postulate that finite reality is in 9 dimensions, and this involves a vortical model . This demonstration supports these hypotheses. It does not, however, say anything about the nature of any of the specific dimensional STC substrates [3], namely those of Space. Time and “Consciousness”

The theoretical background to this calculation applies the mathematical methods in the TDVP model namely, the Calculus of Distinctions, Dimensional Extrapolation and the concept of Indivension. We use the term “Indivension” to describe the fragmentary view we are afforded through the limitations of our physical senses and their physical extensions. We introduce the calculus of distinctions and the process of dimensional extrapolation as tools used to reveal the mathematical and multi-dimensional nature of reality. Finally, we show how the fermion mixing angle (such as the Cabibbo angle) can be derived from the consciousness-based theory we call the Triadic Dimensional distinction Vortical Paradigm (TDVP).

This mathematical derivation has enormous implications for the future of appreciating our reality:

1. It supports the feasibility of our finite reality being a 9-dimensional spin (vortical) reality.

2. It implies that most of our finite reality is hidden because we are limited to what we experience in 3 dimensions of space and 1 point in time (3S-1t).

3. The awareness suggests a potential to apply higher dimensional realities for future research.

4. Additionally, this finding supports several TDVP mathematical constructs:

  • The basic TDVP 9 Dimensional Finite Spin model
  • Dimensional Extrapolation and related Dimensionometry
  • The idea of our 3S-1t reality being relative and not absolute
  • Concepts of Orthogonality at higher dimensions
  • The application of the calculus of distinctions.

5. Furthermore, our derivation applying 9D vortical spin:

  • Consolidates the pertinence of spin
  • The application of relativity corrections in electrons
  • Conservation of angular momentum, and
  • The technique of applying LFAF

6. It provokes serious questions about the concept of finite reality, including that some dimensions that may be hidden from us in our restricted 3S-1t sentient experience.

7. It confirms the derivation of the same approximate Cabibbo mixing angle of 13.032 degrees for mixing angles linked with electron spin.

8. It broadens the Cabibbo concept of weak universality by hypothesizing that all discrete phenomena result from specific dimensional extensions of the same elementary pattern inherent in the multi-dimensional substrate of reality.

Furthermore as extensions to the initial calculations, we can draw further important conclusions.

9. Our calculations supports the finding of electron shape not being uniformly spherical: This is a strong conclusion because otherwise certain calculated velocities in our analysis would exceed the velocity of light.

These findings because of their breadth could generate several novel ideas for testing and application.

from Close ER, Neppe VM: Mathematical and theoretical physics feasibility demonstration of the finite nine

dimensional vortical model in fermions. Dynamic International Journal of Exceptional Creative Achievement 1301:1301; 1-55, 2013

What is Unified Monism?

Unified Monism : A philosophical model developed from the scientific and mathematical metaparadigm of TDVP . Posits a unified reality of Space, Time and Consciousness with the infinite inseparably pervading with the finite.

The consequential result of TDVP is a philosophical model that is applicable to the brain and body, as well as the broader infinite and finite. “Unified Monism” is the necessary philosophical consequence of TDVP, not a primary metaphysical or philosophical conceptual model. Like Kabbalah and TDVP, some of the Eastern mystical philosophies (e.g., Vedic varieties) recognize the unification of reality, the infinite subreality, the broader role of consciousness and a higher guiding element.

TDVP philosophically and conceptually portrays a “Unified Monism ”, an inseparable source linkage forever for both finite and infinite subrealities. From the inseparable source of space, time and extended consciousness at the most fundamental level of origin separations of S, T and C occur in the tethered (looser linked) areas. Though there are zillions of tethered projections the source unification creates a unified philosophical unit.

In contrast is the mystical view (e.g. Spinoza): There is only one individual, God or Substance, and everything else, lives and moves and has its being in God. But, Spinoza rejects a God that manifests Himself as the Attributes, of which mind and matter (extension) are the only two that we humans are acquainted with. Thus Spinoza is not a monist in the sense of (i) above, since his system posits infinitely many dimensions to God's being, each dimension constituting a distinct "kind".

In the mind-body debate, the more important distinction today may be to differentiate atomism or atomic monists, where causation goes bottom up, and holism, where causation flows top down. Our Unified Monism clearly has the Holism element, and we use a top down approach which includes non-material information. In that sense, in the new definition of dualism, it is dualistic but in no other way is it.

Unified Monism Revisited

For the reason above, the unification of a single reality becomes apparent in TDVP . This is why the equivalent philosophical model is called Unified Monism . Despite its apparent monist qualities in its title, is not materialist nor monist in the modern sense. If dualism now refers to consciousness, it has a dualistic element. But for the purist it is monist and the infinite and the finite are unified as there is only one reality.

The finite is embedded within the infinite which means there is no area of necessary interaction - they exist as a unit, hence the philosophy of Unified Monism.

Unified Monism (UM) differs from possibly all the other philosophical models. This is because it is based not ab initio, on philosophy. Instead, UM derives from scientific empiricism, mathematics and logic. Therefore, UM is not in that sense, “metaphysical” because it developed out of science: It is very much a secondary derivation of the metaparadigm that is TDVP. The logic of UM develops out of necessity. There is no need for any connection as in dualism. And there is no need to relate mass-energy or space-time or “consciousness” to be products of the other. All of space, time and “consciousness” independently exist. There is no critique about limitations of our objective physical reality and nor do we have a problem with survival after death or with psi or with meaningful evolution. There is no need for emergence, epiphenomena or derivativeness. All seamlessly fit. No other model in this context makes sense under every circumstance. This is why UM was borne out of necessity: A logical consequence of the science and the mathematics.

Effectively, therefore, Unified Monism is a philosophical endpoint of science and mathematics. This unified model is also an important descriptor of the Science and Mathematics of TDVP.

It is remarkable that both Drs Neppe and Close quite independently developed the same philosophical concept, effectively referring to Unified Monism , even though it did not exist and we are only now defining this new philosophical model!

The term “unified monism” needs another clarification. In current philosophical discussions, the term "monism" is rarely used. The two terms most used are "materialism" and "dualism", the latter often being used to mean "not materialism". The term "monism" is used in two very different ways: it can mean (i) there is only one kind of thing or it can mean (ii) there is only one thing. A materialist usually believes (i) together with the belief that there are many individuals of that kind; an idealist like Berkeley believes (i) together with the assumption that many such individual minds exist. These individuals are "atomistic monists".

About Home Research Navigation Its in the news:
Press & Articles
Blog Protected Pages Vernon Neppe Gateway
Disclaimer: All information contained in this site is copyrighted. 2014 by This may not be reproduced without the written consent of this site. The web-developers have tried to supply as much objective information as possible and as independently as feasible of the original sources, namely this site Vernon Neppe Research (, Pacific Neuropsychiatric Institute (, Vernon Neppe Gateway (, (, and our non-profit for donations site Exceptional Creative Achievement Organization (, Drs Vernon Neppe and Edward Close or any of their affiliates, employees or families. Ideas and information linked externally with this website are not under control and announcements are supplied for assistance. No endorsement of such opinions, ideas and information or responsibility for their contents, claims, or representations should be implied or interpreted. Anyone can post their views and some information maybe dangerously incorrect. This includes the blog. None of these individuals or organizations listed will be liable for any direct, consequential, or other damages resulting from any negligence arising from Client's use of or Client's inability to use the service for any reason. and reserves the right to remove any or all files from the server and does not take responsibility for and reserves the right to remove from public view any material deemed objectionable or libelous, at its sole discretion. Moreover, any damages or claims from sales of material involving, or any other site mentioned above will be limited to a maximum of the value of any item sold less any processing or shipping and handling charges. Any recovery legal or other fees would be borne by the customer. Any items sold through any of these sites are final. Any comments made on or become the absolute property of No remuneration or royalties will be paid for such comments. Due to the public nature of the Internet, all information should be considered potentially accessible to the public. None of these groups are liable. There are limitations to protection or privacy of electronic mail or other information transferred through the Internet or other network that the client may utilize and the client assumes full responsibility. Pursuant to the Electronic and Communications Privacy Act of 1986, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 2510 and following, notice is hereby given that there are no facilities provided by this system for sending or receiving private or confidential messages. Messages marked as "private" may be read by the providers and could be read by other users of this service These electronically-transmitted pages belong to and are offered for your personal use. All rights are reserved. These pages may not be duplicated or reproduced without the express written consent of except in the form of brief excerpts or quotations for the purposes of review. The information contained here is for the personal use of the reader and may not be incorporated in publications, databases, or software programs without the written consent of these websites, their affiliates and their related companies. Making copies of these pages or any portion for any purpose other than your personal use is a violation of United States copyright laws. Prices for products and services offered by or the other sites mentioned are subject to change without notice. Any sales are final. This site is used at the users exclusive risk.